maio 22, 2020

Brazil: Regina Duarte and the Dictatorship Fuss


I'd like to highlight two key concerns about all this "Dictatorship Fuss" thing going on media about Regina Duarte's article.


FIRST - CULTURE AND IDEOLOGY

After reading her article "Que classe é essa, companheiro?" you'll certainly notice a very clean concept - administration free of ideologies.

In her own words:
O País precisa de uma política cultural que transcenda ideologias.
(The country needs a cultural policy that transcends ideologies)

At first sight you "buy" the idea but thinking better I'd like to ask you:
Is this possible? Feasible?

Across the same article, we notice that concepts are set resembling a list like something entitled "This is the way I think, ideas that I fight for".
Like her, we all have our own list of things that we believe and fight for and such thing compounds what we are, the culture we embrace, the influences we accept and we reject.

So, how could it be possible to handle "culture" without ideologies if the former is the consequence of the latter?


SECOND - DICTATORSHIP VS. DEATH TOLL

Many people blame dictatorship period in Brazil summing up in a simple quote:
"It killed too many..."

Ok, so let's think about it.
Suppose that you go to England to overthrow Queen Elizabeth, or maybe you go to China or Russia to overthrow the communist regime.
Certainly, you'll try to stick together with others having the same target.
What do you think will happen to you and all others?

Every time a System is threatened it reacts to defend itself.
If you try to destroy, you may be destroyed.
Although ideology and political issues, it is yet a war.

Complaining that people died when they've attacked to destroy is the same as blaming a soldier for killing enemies in the war.
Putting in simple and straight words is simple like that!

Dictatorship is extremely dangerous and harmful because the power comes from "one desire over the others".

Due to our ego this a bad thing but suppose that the dictatorship had a very special personality, so good like the bests — kind, fair, honest, etc.
Wouldn't you like to be led by someone like this?
Suppose being governed by a saint...

So dictatorship is proportionally bad as it is our moral status or the leader's moral status. That way, it may be said that it is not bad or good by itself, but relative to our moral conditions.

Unfortunately, there is no regime free of some kind of dictatorship that turns it bad.
Democracies stand week to fight against the "Corruption's Dictatorship".
Same to Socialists regimes.

Besides corruption, every time someone or group gets powerful, some kind of dictatorship effect is hardly avoided due to egocentric issues.

Does this matter have a solution?

Certainly does but takes time.
It will require that the human being evolves reducing ideologies' differences considering key concerns.

Do you think impossible?
No, it is not.
Try to think about the concepts that in the past we fought for and now became common sense in modern society.
This is the evolution path.

I hope we all get this common sense sooner before we get destroyed by ourselves as we are known as a society nowadays, otherwise, a new civilization cycle will begin taking more time to learn the same lesson.

Eventually, we will all have to learn it while earth conditions sustains life.


Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário

O Radicalismo, A Dualidade e A Polarização Fazem Parte do Nosso Carácter Sem Quem Nem Mesmo Tenhamos Consciência da Sua Origem

  NOTA: É recomendável conhecer o conteúdo do post anterior para compreender melhor este. O esporte atrai milhares de torcedores desde temp...